At present, the development and application of medical robotic technologies, medical robotic devices, automated technical systems in healthcare is quite successful and has great potential for further advancements [1; 6]. There are several reasons for such a rapid introduction of innovative technologies into the medical practice, and it is not only obsession with inventive powers, but also the personal ability to find the non-standard solutions to the problems and life tasks that has the purely biological grounds.
Every year the Earth population is growing faster than the number of highly qualified specialists. The particularly pressing problem is the nursing shortage. They are the specialists who perform the complicated but routine tasks directly “at the patient’s bedside”, especially as a part of comprehensive medical rehabilitation programs. Over time, this trend will undoubtedly lead to the fact that the experienced specialists will focus on those skills that, for one reason or another, cannot be automated, and all other functions will be performed by the robotic complexes with the artificial intelligence feature.
In addition, during any medical procedure, it is quite difficult to accurately control the procedural protocol, and even more so to protect confidentiality of the patient and the comfort zone optimal for him/her. It is related to the so-called human factor.
These reasons and a number of other reasons force the healthcare providers to think about automation of individual medical staff activities using the robotic systems.
It is expected that the use of medical robots has clear advantages providing the following:
- replacement of the time-consuming manual work of medical professionals;
- reduction in the medical staff number involved in the treatment process;
- realization of the possibility of virtually unlimited throughput of robotic complexes;
- usage of the precise motor tasks that are difficult to perform without special equipment;
- reduction of the recovery time of impaired functions due to the long-term stereotypical training of cyclic locomotor behavior;
- performance of procedures with the treatment and diagnostic interaction, using biofeedback that allows each time to select the most optimal operating mode for each individual patient.
Along with robotic prostheses and exoskeletons (ReWalk, ExoAtlet), humanoids (SimMan 3G, Simroid), service robot assistants (Helpmate, RP-8, RIBA), robotic rehabilitation systems (Biodex, Lokomat, Con-trex, ReoGo, G-EO, С-MiLL, Erigo, Armeo), as well as robotic manipulators for surgery, especially microsurgery (da Vinci, Smart Tissue), an important and promising area emphasized by the experts in the field of medical robotics includes the robotic units for medical procedures in the patients with the musculoskeletal disorders, in particular the manipulation robots for massage and passive movements [2].
For the first time, the idea of the massage hardware robotic control was proposed by the scientists at the 2nd Symposium on Medical Robotics in Heidelberg in 1997. The Puma 560 six-unit industrial robot, designed for assembly and arc welding, was supplemented with a force sensor to measure the interaction force of the robot tool with the patient's soft tissues. The robot "felt" the patient, memorized its body contours, elasticity, then calculated the massage trajectories and reproduced them using its drives. The standard robot control system, designed for the positional and continuous-path control, could respectively implement the algorithms for separate position-force control. The robot used individual classical massage methods and acupressure techniques for the dummies, dogs, and human volunteers. This robotic massage method was protected by a patent [3].
Subsequently, the developed domestic robotic manipulation complex was improved under the auspices of the State Industrial University and the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Ministry of Healthcare of [4]. The robotic arm software was developed on the basis of the OMRON TM5-700 collaborative robot (Japan). Moreover, a diagnostic strain-algorithmometric unit, an equipment assembly designed to make a three-dimensional model of the human body surface and a temperature scanning system (temperature mapping of the patient's body surface) were added.
Later, the similar manipulative robots were developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Beijing University, Kin Teck Tong Singapore Medical Center, where the devices were clinically tested on the patients with traumatic epicondylitis, back pain and neck stiffness, as well as other pathological conditions [7; 8; 9; 10].
However, when implementing the proposed robotic systems, the following organizational and technical problems still remain unresolved:
- improvement of the product design and aesthetic appeal;
- development of the most simple and convenient user interface with a visual display of both the examination results and the manipulation methods;
- mathematical description of massage techniques;
- development of a system that allows to create programs using a set of massage techniques and movements;
- determination of the variability limits for each massage technique (general and individual) in various body zones;
- development of a system and algorithm for quick and easy nozzle changeover;
- improvement of the safe relations system for the robot and human interaction;
- formation of the fundamentals to develop a new specialty, such as a masseur-operator of robotic systems.
- In addition to the aesthetic criteria that are necessary in the medical institutions, the robotic arm design shall also be based on the ethical principles of robotics [5]. Thus, a robot assistant, and a robot for massage manipulations, belongs to this category:
- they shall not have an anthropomorphic shape (shall not awake fear, disgust and base instincts in a person, both a patient and an operator);
- they shall not replace a similar human function without its improvement and expansion (shall not repeat human stupidity and limitations);
- they shall not generalizing conclusions that go beyond the scope of the program (shall not make independent decisions that could lead to the consequences significant for a person).
In an attempt to solve at least some of these problems, if not all of them, in 2021 Beautyliner Group, proposed the Robosculptor robotic massage complex (Fig. 1) for practical use that was based on a collaborative robotic arm equipped with a massage nozzle, a high-speed time-of-flight (FoT) camera for making the patient 3D images, an infrared camera for solving the patient’s body recognition problems, a platform for the robotic arm movement along the human body, as well as an adjustable couch, a supporting unit frame and other auxiliary systems.